A comedian and writer has sparked debate after turning down an AI job interview, arguing that technology should not replace human connection in recruitment.

Richard Stott, a freelancer from Beverley in East Yorkshire, applied for a freelance copywriting role but declined the interview when informed it would be conducted by Artificial Intelligence.

“It didn’t sit well with me,” Stott said. “If interviewing in person isn’t worth their time, then the role isn’t worth mine.”

His decision has attracted widespread support online, where he shared his experience. Many users agreed that relying solely on AI to assess candidates was “not a good idea.”

Stott said he found the process “disrespectful,” noting that employers should invest time in real conversations. “When you join a team, personality matters — and that can’t be captured through data. Allowing AI to remove that seems counterintuitive,” he added.

Despite his concerns, Stott acknowledged that AI can be valuable when used responsibly. “It’s fantastic for handling repetitive or laborious tasks,” he said. “Not everyone can reject an interview, but if enough people say no, the trend may not take off.”

Hayfa Mohdzaini, senior technology adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), emphasized the need for balance.

“Employers must combine AI efficiency with human interaction,” she said. “While an AI chatbot may save costs, it can discourage some candidates. Employers should clearly explain when and why AI is being used.”

The CIPD has urged companies to consider candidate preferences carefully to avoid losing top talent in an increasingly digital recruitment world.